CompareComparing...

Chivalry: Medieval Warfare

Now Reading
Chivalry: Medieval Warfare

Overview
Name

Chivalry: Medieval Warfare

Company

Torn Banner Studios

Release Date

16 Oct, 2012

Minimum Needs

OS: Windows XP
Processor: Intel Core 2 Duo 2.4 GHz or AMD Athlon X2 2.7 GHz (a dual-core CPU is required)
Memory: 2 GB RAM
Graphics: ATI Radeon 3870 or higher, Nvidia GeForce 8800 GT or higher. 512MB VRAM.
DirectX®: 9.0c
Hard Drive: 7 GB HD space
Other Requirements: Broadband Internet connection
Supported controls:: Keyboard + Mouse, or Xbox 360 controller, Xbox One controller, or compatible XInput controller

System

PC

Positives

+ Firts point is the type of the game. Nowadays people are looking for medieval themed games. And if you are one of them, you can think about this game.

+ Graphics and contents are enough to satisfy gamers.

+ Sounds are realy good. Unlike in warband, here you can feel your sword is touching to the enemy by its sound..

+ A lot of servers, players, contents... etc.

Negatives

- You need realy high disc space.

- Graphics are not simplified, so you cannot play if you don't have really good computer.

- Gameplay is not very well. After playing ''Warband'' i was expecting more professional combat system.

Our Rating
User Rating
Rate Here
Graphics
7.5
8.2
Sounds
7.8
8.6
Ease of Use (associated with its minimum system needs)
4.3
4.8
Mechanics
2.1
5.4
Gameplay
7.0
5.9
Community
2.5
1.6
Type
7.8
8.1
Popularity
5.9
5.5
Clarity (bugs etc.)
7.5
5.7
Bottom Line

Read the article for more explanation about its negatives...

5.4
Our Rating
5.8
User Rating
2 ratings
You have rated this

 

This is the first review, maybe i’ll write another one..

First of all you can see that producers are like they put great effort into this game. Huge disk space, high detailed graphics and great sounds etc. Now lets see what we have;

+ Firts point is the type of the game. Nowadays people are looking for medieval themed games. And if you are one of them, you can think about this game.

+ Graphics and contents are enough to satisfy gamers

+ Sounds are realy good. Unlike in warband, here you can feel your sword is touching to the enemy by its sound..

+ A lot of servers, players, contents… etc.

What about negative points;

– You need realy high disc space

– Graphics are not simplified, so you cannot play if you don’t have really good computer

– Gameplay is not very well. After playing ”Warband” i was expecting more professional combat system.

* No direction for your hit, you hit from above and directly with your sword by some other buttons(mouse wheel). And by left mouse button u hit only one direction.
*Blocking is also only one animated move, like u hit right mouse button and it is done. No direction.. Only thing is timing.. You can not hold and wait in blocking position.
* Actually if we go deeply we can write pages. But what i mean is realy poor combat system. You cannot see your weapon’s reach point like in warband. By ”see” I mean cannot feel like in warband u can.

Actually after speeking much about ”Warband” if we compare them, what makes ”Warband” number one is NOT the high quality of graphics or huge contents, it is the uniqe GAME MECHANİCS like combat sysytem.. Looks like producers spent lots of money but without a perfect combat system it is not different than other thousands of games.

Finally if you ask to me ”Would you buy this game?”, ”No, I wouldnt buy it. Because even if you like the game, it is not like some special games you can play for thousands of hours.”

Best wishes..

 

What's your reaction?
Overcooked
0%
Improvable
0%
Nice Theme
0%
Recommended
Pro
0%
Masterpiece
0%
About The Author
Gamonster
Gamonster

“Everything is teetering on the edge of everything.” (Spec Ops: The Line)

Comments
Leave a response

Leave a Response